Increasing Resource Parents’ Access to Training and Data: An Overview of Two Child Welfare Initiatives


Resource parents
Child welfare

How to Cite

RomanoE., & StenasonL. (2022). Increasing Resource Parents’ Access to Training and Data: An Overview of Two Child Welfare Initiatives. International Journal of Child and Adolescent Resilience, 9(1), 61-75.


Objectives: Resource parents are critical to young people’s well-being, resilient functioning, and placement stability. However, child welfare often experiences challenges in retaining resource parents, which may be partially due to the limited availability of in-service resources. We describe two in-service training initiatives for resource parents in Ontario (Canada) that can support their important caregiving work. We also present preliminary mixed-methods findings on training reactions and learning.
Methods: The first study sampled 91 resource parents who completed the Resource Parent Curriculum (RPC) and collected module evaluations as well as post-program satisfaction data. The second study collected post-training evaluations from 26 resource parents who completed training using the Assessment and Action Record (AAR) to better understand youth in-care.
Results: Resource parents responded positively to the RPC content and delivery; they appreciated the online format (due to COVID-19 restrictions). Parents noted it was helpful to learn how trauma shapes young people’s expectations and how thoughts, feelings, and behaviours are interconnected. For the second study, parents’ overall training rating was positive. They noted it was helpful to learn how different perspectives could be integrated through AAR findings and highlighted the importance of collaboration with child welfare workers. The training initiatives were well-received and attested to resource parents’ motivation to keep improving their parenting practices. Findings indicated gains in knowledge around trauma-informed parenting and indicated the value of data to support young people’s well-being.
Implications: Retention will likely improve when resource parents feel supported and capable of handling young people’s complex needs. To improve outcomes for both youth in-care and resource parents, it seems important to make training and support available on a regular and ongoing basis and in a collaborative way with child welfare partners.


Ackerman, P. T., Newton, J. E. O., McPherson, W. B., Jones, J. G., & Dykman, R. A. (1998). Prevalence of post traumatic stress disorder and other psychiatric diagnoses in three groups of abused children (sexual, physical, and both). Child Abuse and Neglect, 22(8), 759-774.

Barbell, K., & Freundlich, M. (2001). Foster care today (pp. 1-7). Casey Family Programs.

Barber, J. G., Delfabbro, P. H., & Cooper, L. L. (2001). The predictors of unsuccessful transition to foster care. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(6), 785-790.

Baring-Gould, M., Essick, D., Kelinkauf, C., & Miller, M. (1983). Why do foster homes close? Arete, 8(2), 49–63.

Blaustein, M. E., & Kinniburgh, K. M. (2018). Treating traumatic stress in children and adolescents: How to foster resilience through attachment, self-regulation, and competency (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Buehler, C., Cox, M. E., & Cuddeback, G. (2003). Foster parents’ perceptions of factors that promote or inhibit successful fostering. Qualitative Social Work, 2(1), 61-83.

Burge, P. (2007). Prevalence of mental disorders and associated service variables among Ontario children who are permanent wards. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 52(5), 305-314.

California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare (2021). Resource Parent Programs.

Campbell, C., & Downs, S. W. (1987). The impact of economic incentives on foster parents. Social Service Review, 61(4), 599-609.

Carrilio, T. E. (2008). Accountability, evidence, and the use of information systems in social service programs. Journal of Social Work, 8(2), 135-148.

Coakley, T. M., Cuddeback, G., Buehler, C., & Cox, M. E. (2007). Kinship foster parents' perceptions of factors that promote or inhibit successful fostering. Children and Youth Services Review, 29(1), 92-109.

Collins-Camargo, C., Sullivan, D., & Murphy, A. (2011). Use of data to assess performance and promote outcome achievement by public and private child welfare agency staff. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(2), 330-339.

Cooley, M. E., Farineau, H. M., & Mullis, A. K. (2015). Child behaviors as a moderator: Examining the relationship between foster parent supports, satisfaction, and intent to continue fostering. Child Abuse & Neglect, 45(1), 46-56.

Esposito, T., Trocmé, N., Chabot, M., Coughlin, L., Gaumont, C., & Delaye, A. (2016). Better understand to better serve: A province-wide knowledge mobilization initiative in child protection. Child Indicators Research, 9(3), 651-661.

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92.

Flynn, R. J., Ghazal, H., Legault, L., Vandermeulen, G., & Petrick, S. (2004). Use of population measures and norms to identify resilient outcomes in young people in-care: An exploratory study. Child and Family Social Work, 9(1), 65-79.

Flynn, R., Vincent, C., & Legault, L. (2009). User’s Manual for the AAR-C2-2006. Centre for Research on Educational and Community Services, University of Ottawa.

Geiger, J. M., Hayes, M. J., & Lietz, C. A. (2013). Should I stay or should I go? A mixed methods study examining the factors influencing foster parents' decisions to continue or discontinue providing foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(9), 1356-1365.

Heflinger, C. A., Simpkins, C. G., & Combs-Orme, T. (2000). Using the CBCL to determine the clinical status of children in state custody. Children and Youth Services Review, 22(1), 55-73.

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.

Kalland, M., & Sinkkonen, J. (2001). Finnish children in foster care: Evaluating the breakdown of long-term placements. Child welfare, 80(5), 513.

Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2016). Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training evaluation. ATD Press.

Koh, E., Rolock, N., Cross, T. P., & Eblen-Manning, J. (2014). What explains instability in foster care? Comparison of a matched sample of children with stable and unstable placements. Children and Youth Services Review, 37(1), 36-45.

Konijn, C., Admiraal, S., Baart, J., van Rooij, F., Stams, G. J., Colonnesi, C., Lindauer, R., & Assink, M. (2019). Foster care placement instability: A meta-analytic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 96(1), 483-499.

Leschied, A. W., Rodger, S., Brown, J., den Dunnen, W., & Pickel, L. (2014). Rescuing a critical resource: A review of the foster care retention and recruitment literature and its relevance in the Canadian child welfare context. Child Welfare League of Canada.

Leslie, L. K., Landsverk, J., Ezzet-Lofstrom, R., Tschann, J. M., Slymen, D. J., & Garland, A. F. (2000). Children in foster care: Factors influencing outpatient mental health service use. Child abuse & neglect, 24(4), 465-476.

Lockwood, K. K., Friedman, S., & Christian, C. W. (2015). Permanency and the foster care system. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, 45(10), 306-315.

MacGregor, T. E., Rodger, S., Cummings, A. L., & Leschied, A. W. (2006). The needs of foster parents: A qualitative study of motivation, support, and retention. Qualitative Social Work, 5(3), 351-368.

Murray, L., Tarren-Sweeney, M., & France, K. (2011). Foster carer perceptions of support and training in the context of high burden of care. Child & Family Social Work, 16(2), 149-158.

National Child Traumatic Stress Network (2022). Resource Parent Curriculum.

Newton, R. R., Litrownik, A. J., & Landsverk, J. A. (2000). Children and youth in foster care: Distangling the relationship between problem behaviours and number of placements. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(10), 1363-1374.

Perry, G., Daly, M., & Kotler, J. (2012). Placement stability in kinship and non-kin foster care: A Canadian study. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(2), 460-465.

Rodger, S., Cummings, A., & Leschied, A. W. (2006). Who is caring for our most vulnerable children? The motivation to foster in child welfare. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30(10), 1129-1142.

Romano, E., Stenason, L., Weegar, K., & Cheung, C. (2020). Improving child welfare’s use of data for service planning: Practitioner perspectives on a training curriculum. Children and Youth Services Review, 110, Article 10478.

Rork, K. E., & McNeil, C. B. (2011). Evaluation of foster parent training programs: A critical review. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 33(2), 139-170.

Rubin, D., O'Reilly, A., Luan, X., & Localio, A. (2007). The impact of placement stability on behavioral well-being for children in foster care. Pediatrics, 119(2), 336-44.

Schofield, G., Beek, M., & Ward, E. (2012). Part of the family: Planning for permanence in long-term family foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 244-253.

Stenason, L., Romano, E., & Cheung, C. (2021). Using research within child welfare: Reactions to a training initiative. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 18(2), 214-234.

Sullivan, D. J., & van Zyl, M. A. (2007). The well-being of children in foster care: Exploring physical and mental health needs. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 774-786.

Trocmé, N., Fallon, B., MacLaurin, B., Sinha, V., Black, T., Fast, E., Felstiner, C., Hélie, S., Turcotte, D., Weightman, P., Douglas, J., & Holroyd, J. (2010). Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect: 2008 Major Findings. Public Health Agency of Canada. cnivf/pdfs/nfnts-cis-2008-rprt-eng.pdf

Whenan, R., Oxlad, M., & Lushington, K. (2009). Factors associated with foster carer well-being, satisfaction, and intention to continue providing out-of-home care. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(7), 752-760.